Act 3 starts with the Mechanicals rehearsing Pyramus and Thisby. Before rehearsal starts, Bottom says "There are things in this comedy of
Pyramus and Thisby that will never please" and this time through I
laughed wondering if Shakespeare thought that of Midsummer and jabbing
at every comedy needing those moments to make them more than the delightful
absurdity of Pyramus and Thisby.
I love that the things the mechanicals worry about are either that
the audience will have too much imagination: believeing pyramus is a
real person and is now dead, believeing that the lion will attack the
ladies- and simultaneously wrry that the audience will not have enough
imagination- how do we bring in moonshine?!?!?! or a wall?!
I think this is particularly funny b/c I know i've been in shows
where we worry about things that essentially end up being as
absurd/unnoticeable to friends in the audience as the aforementioned
"problems" would have been if the mechanicals left it alone.
There are so many great making fun of actor moments in this play!!And seriously- audiences love that shit.
So after the rehearsal starts, Puck transforms Bottom by giving him
an asses head (we can debate whether you think that's what happens or
whether you think he's transformed into a talking ass with a human
body... but i think it is the former). The Mechanicals are clearly
frightened out of their wits- so WHY does Puck have his speech about
leading them through brake and briar as a number of animals? Just for
Puck's love of mayhem and mischief? Or is he afraid they will want to
stay with Bottom in spite of their fear?
Bottom wakes Titania with his singing- the more ridiculous the
better because the whole audience knows she's going to fall for him- since
she has no choice in the matter being all potioned up. I do love that
Titania just kind of mentions that he will stay with her whether he
wants to or not and then goes on assuming he wants to. And on this point
I'm with her. why wouldnt he want to be waited on and adored by the
QUEEN OF THE FAIRIES!! But what's endearing about Bottom is that even
though he knows he's Titania's new obsession, he is interested and jolly
and kind with the attending fairies, giving each of them a shining
moment.
Act 3 sc. 2 is monstrously long and this is where I would put an
intermission. Just before this scene. But since we haven't been sitting through an entire play on we go...
This scene is crazy long. I know there are longer scenes that
Shakespeare just kept going with- we'll get to those-but it is not just the length that makes me argue for pre-3.2 intermission.
Another reason I feel like this scene is supposed to come after
intermission is the way Puck does a re-cap of what we just saw to catch
up Oberon. After this little summary, Demetrius and Hermia enter,
setting up the groundwork for the epic lovers quarrel that happens
later in the scene. Hermia is kind of crazy in this scene but it
creates this wonderful reversal where Demetrius can't keep up with HER
the same way Helena couldn't keep up with him. After Helena leaves, as Demetrius sleeps,
Oberon uses the flower (or let's talk about what the script says: "love
juice" yeah. i'm just gunna put that one out there and leave it.) so
that when he wakes up he can see Helena and then Oberon's original plan that Puck
screwed up will be back on course. So Puck comes back and says the
famous "what fools these mortals be!" line - but I'm convinced that at
the moment Oberon thinks Puck is the fool especially since his only
response is "stand aside."
Lysander and Helena have apparently been going in circles since the
last time we saw about how he loves her and she thinks he is mocking
her.
Love this moment from Helena:
These vows are Hermia's. Will you give her o'er?
Weigh oath with oath, and you will nothing weigh.
Your vows to her and me put in two scales
Will even weigh and both as light as tales
Good advice. beware relationships born of lying and cheating. I
kind of think this passage is a good moment to illustraet that in spite of her
betrayal of Hermia's secret plan to run into the woods, she really tries
to be a good friend.
I also think we get a glimpse in this scene why Helena loved
Demetrius in the first place- his "wooing" lines seem much more
competent than those of Lysander.
"O Helen, goddess, nymph, perfect, divine!" etc.
Additionally, Helena's response to this line is incredibly smart. I
think too many productions of Midsummer make Helena simpering and
pathetic and that her stupidity makes her choose Demetrius, rather than
her love for Demetrius making her foolish.
TEACHING MOMENT: In our gateway course for grad school we had to analyze the
rhetoric/verse of two characters and compare and contrast them- I'd
like to give that assignment to someone for Demetrius and Lysander. And for that
matter Hermia and Helena. I have a feeling this scene becomes even funnier
when you play the differences in the four lovers rather than the
similarities.
So Hermia enters the scene and when Helena thinks she is in on the
"trick" the boys are playing she gives this stunning speech describing
her friendship with Hermia:
Is all the counsel that we two have shar’d,
The sisters’ vows, the hours that we have spent,
When we have chid the hasty-footed time
For parting us—O, is all forgot?
All school-days friendship, childhood innocence?
We, Hermia, like two artificial gods,
Have with our needles created both one flower,
Both on one sampler, sitting on one cushion,
Both warbling of one song, both in onekey,
As if our hands, our sides, voices, and minds
Had been incorporate. So we grew together,
Like to a double cherry, seeming parted,
But yet an union in partition,
Two lovely berries moulded on one stem;
So with two seeming bodies, but one heart,
Two of the first, like coats in heraldry,
Due but to one, and crowned with one crest.
The sisters’ vows, the hours that we have spent,
When we have chid the hasty-footed time
For parting us—O, is all forgot?
All school-days friendship, childhood innocence?
We, Hermia, like two artificial gods,
Have with our needles created both one flower,
Both on one sampler, sitting on one cushion,
Both warbling of one song, both in onekey,
As if our hands, our sides, voices, and minds
Had been incorporate. So we grew together,
Like to a double cherry, seeming parted,
But yet an union in partition,
Two lovely berries moulded on one stem;
So with two seeming bodies, but one heart,
Two of the first, like coats in heraldry,
Due but to one, and crowned with one crest.
Friendship in Shakespeare's works is something I'm interested in
continuing to examine as I work through this project. Do Demetrius and
Lysander understand this kind of friendship? The men don't seem to have
many friends in this play unless you count Oberon and Puck? Is their
relationship more master/servant than the relationship Titania has with
her group of fairies? What about the Mechanicals? are they friends? or
just working together for the sake of this play?
Gender Thoughts: "Our sex, as well as I, may chide you for it"
-Helena seems to bring up what is appropriate for each gender role a
LOT. and the male/female divide is interesting in this comedy because
there is less gender confusion than in other comedies in the cannon
(i.e. no cross-dressing) but its interesting the way this Helena shares a
rhetorical trope with the All's well Helena - she is constantly
apologizing for what she recognizes as a transgression of gender norms.
There's a paper topic here somewhere.... remind me to tag this entry
with Blackfriars conference brainstorm.
The fight that ensues after Hermia realizes Lysander is not joking
about his love for Helena is a physical comedy gold mine and has some
fantastic lines, but what really gets me is the performance choice of
what the heck Puck and Oberon are doing throughout this fight. Are they
just watching and enjoying? is Oberon bewildered? upset? amused? Is he
stopping Hermia from tearing Helena's eyes out? is puck encouraging the
fighting? I am torn between the endless possibility of how to use these
"invisible" presences in the fight vs. how to keep the focus on the
words/story in general, indeed how to make the two work together to
highlight both.
A final thought: I love that Puck seems to think he is a ghost or demon
My fairy lord, this must be done with haste,
For Night’s swift dragons cut the clouds full fast,
And yonder shines Aurora’s harbinger,
At whose approach, ghosts, wand’ring here and there,
Troop home to churchyards. Damned spirits all,
That in crossways and floods have burial,
Already to their wormy beds are gone.
For fear lest day should look their shames upon,
They willfully themselves exile from light,
And must for aye consort with black-brow’d Night.
For Night’s swift dragons cut the clouds full fast,
And yonder shines Aurora’s harbinger,
At whose approach, ghosts, wand’ring here and there,
Troop home to churchyards. Damned spirits all,
That in crossways and floods have burial,
Already to their wormy beds are gone.
For fear lest day should look their shames upon,
They willfully themselves exile from light,
And must for aye consort with black-brow’d Night.
And oberon has to correct him and tell him "but we are spirits of another sort"
Did Puck never play in the daytime before now? I think this whole passage/exchange is so odd.
This act ends with Puck bringing the lovers back together and
"fixing" the love potion plan so there are two happy couples. It ends
with FOUR PEOPLE sleeping onstage. Another argument for not putting the
intermission after this act- unless you are intrigued people sleeping
onstage through intermission or unless you are in a theatre with a
curtain. Personally, I think its kind of cruel to deny actors their
intermission. Especially if there is doubling going on and they are
onstage a lot and don't have many opportunities to hydrate/ use the
restroom. Also, Act 4 begins to get into the "too many endings" argument
Zac mentioned in a comment yesterday, or as I like to refer to it- the
"Lord of the Rings" syndrome. so look for that tomorrow.
Until then, today's picture is a poster from a production of
Midsummer happening soon through the Shakespeare Forum. If you are in or
near NYC you should check it out. Here's a link to the facebook invite: https://www.facebook.com/events/498399530191384/
I haven't read this play in a while and don't know if this thought is completely off base, but it came to mind because of the comments and thoughts you've been expressing: what if Puck isn't a "spirit of another sort?" What if he INTENTIONALLY does all the things he does? What if he is a demon? Do you understand what i'm saying?
ReplyDeleteI think you can rationalize the Puck stuff - after all, he basically impersonates people and demons to get the lovers all gathered, probably hoping that, if they remember the experience, that's what they'll think happened.
ReplyDeleteBut then, really, why does he care? So I'm with you after all.
I think the problem there is that Oberon says "WE are spirits of another sort" so either Oberon doesnt realize Puck is not for your theory to work... or maybe Puck wishes he were a demon? Maybe all his friends are demons? I DO think there's a lot of mileage to be had out of the fact that Titania calls are her fairies "elves" and Puck is referred to as a "hobgoblin" Either way, I am definitely on board with him intentionally causing mayhem and that he could cause much more if it werent for oberon keping him in tact!
ReplyDelete